Perioperative pain optimization in the age of the opioid epidemic.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The opioid epidemic remains a constant and increasing threat to our society with overdoses and overdose deaths rising significantly during the COVID-19 pandemic. Growing evidence suggests a link between perioperative opioid use, postoperative opioid prescribing, and the development of opioid use disorder (OUD). As a result, strategies to better optimize pain management during the perioperative period are urgently needed. The purpose of this review is to summarize the most recent multimodal analgesia (MMA) recommendations, summarize evidence for efficacy surrounding the increased utilization of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols, and discuss the implications for rising use of buprenorphine for OUD patients who present for surgery. In addition, this review will explore opportunities to expand our treatment of complex patients via transitional pain services. RECENT FINDINGS: There is ample evidence to support the benefits of MMA. However, optimal drug combinations remain understudied, presenting a target area for future research. ERAS protocols provide a more systematic and targeted approach for implementing MMA. ERAS protocols also allow for a more comprehensive approach to perioperative pain management by necessitating the involvement of surgical specialists. Increasingly, OUD patients taking buprenorphine are presenting for surgery. Recent guidance from a multisociety OUD working group recommends that buprenorphine not be routinely discontinued or tapered perioperatively. Lastly, there is emerging evidence to justify the use of transitional pain services for more comprehensive treatment of complex patients, like those with chronic pain, preoperative opioid tolerance, or substance use disorder. SUMMARY: Perioperative physicians must be aware of the impact of the opioid epidemic and explore methods like MMA techniques, ERAS protocols, and transitional pain services to improve the perioperative pain experience and decrease the risks of opioid-related harm.

The intersection of pediatric anesthesiology and social determinants of health.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There is increasing evidence of racial and ethnic disparities in pediatric perioperative care, which indicates a need to identify factors driving disparities. Social determinants of health (SDOH) play a fundamental role in pediatric health and are recognized as key underlying mechanisms of healthcare inequities. This article summarizes recent research exploring the influence of SDOH on pediatric perioperative outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS: Despite the scarcity of research exploring SDOH and pediatric perioperative outcomes, recent work demonstrates an association between SDOH and multiple outcomes across the perioperative care continuum. Measures of social disadvantage were associated with preoperative symptom severity, longer hospital stays, and higher rates of postoperative complications and mortality. In some studies, these adverse effects of social disadvantage persisted even when controlling for medical comorbidities and clinical severity. SUMMARY: The existing literature offers compelling evidence of the impact of SDOH on perioperative outcomes in children and reveals a critical area in pediatric anesthesia that necessitates further exploration and action. To improve outcomes and address care inequities, future efforts should prioritize the integration of SDOH assessment into pediatric perioperative research and practice.

Advances in pediatric perioperative care using artificial intelligence.

PURPOSE OF THIS REVIEW: This article explores how artificial intelligence (AI) can be used to evaluate risks in pediatric perioperative care. It will also describe potential future applications of AI, such as models for airway device selection, controlling anesthetic depth and nociception during surgery, and contributing to the training of pediatric anesthesia providers. RECENT FINDINGS: The use of AI in healthcare has increased in recent years, largely due to the accessibility of large datasets, such as those gathered from electronic health records. Although there has been less focus on pediatric anesthesia compared to adult anesthesia, research is on- going, especially for applications focused on risk factor identification for adverse perioperative events. Despite these advances, the lack of formal external validation or feasibility testing results in uncertainty surrounding the clinical applicability of these tools. SUMMARY: The goal of using AI in pediatric anesthesia is to assist clinicians in providing safe and efficient care. Given that children are a vulnerable population, it is crucial to ensure that both clinicians and families have confidence in the clinical tools used to inform medical decision- making. While not yet a reality, the eventual incorporation of AI-based tools holds great potential to contribute to the safe and efficient care of our patients.

Perioperative management of patients on glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To summarize the mechanism of action, clinical outcomes, and perioperative implications of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1-RAs). Specifically, this review focuses on the available literature surrounding complications (primarily, bronchoaspiration) and current recommendations, as well as knowledge gaps and future research directions on the perioperative management of GLP-1-RAs. RECENT FINDINGS: GLP-1-RAs are known to delay gastric emptying. Accordingly, recent case reports and retrospective observational studies, while anecdotal, suggest that the perioperative use of GLP-1-RAs may increase the risk of bronchoaspiration despite fasting intervals that comply with (and often exceed) current guidelines. As a result, guidelines and safety bulletins have been published by several Anesthesiology Societies. SUMMARY: While rapidly emerging evidence suggests that perioperative GLP-1-RAs use is associated with delayed gastric emptying and increased risk of bronchoaspiration (particularly in patients undergoing general anesthesia and/or deep sedation), high-quality studies are needed to provide definitive answers with respect to the safety and duration of preoperative drug cessation, and optimal fasting intervals according to the specific GLP-1-RA agent, the dose/duration of administration, and patient-specific factors. Meanwhile, clinicians must be aware of the potential risks associated with the perioperative use of GLP-1-RAs and follow the recommendations put forth by their respective Anesthesiology Societies.

Anesthesia for gender-affirming surgery: a practical review.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Gender-affirming surgery (GAS) is an effective, well studied, and often necessary component of gender-affirming care and mitigation of gender dysphoria for transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) individuals. GAS is categorized as chest surgeries, genitourinary surgeries, facial feminization/masculinization, and vocal phonosurgery. Despite increased incidence of GAS during recent years, there is a gap in knowledge and training on perioperative care for TGD patients. RECENT FINDINGS: Our review discusses the relevant anesthetic considerations for the most common GAS, which often involve highly specialized surgical techniques that have unique implications for the anesthesia professional. SUMMARY: Anesthesiology professionals must attend to the surgical and anesthetic nuances of various GAS procedures. However, as many considerations are based on common practice, research is warranted on anesthetic implications and outcomes of GAS.

Evidence-based Perioperative Practice Utilization among Various Racial Populations-A Retrospective Cohort Trending Analysis of Lower Extremity Total Joint Arthroplasty Patients.

BACKGROUND: Various studies have demonstrated racial disparities in perioperative care and outcomes. The authors hypothesize that among lower extremity total joint arthroplasty patients, evidence-based perioperative practice utilization increased over time among all racial groups, and that standardized evidence-based perioperative practice care protocols resulted in reduction of racial disparities and improved outcomes. METHODS: The study analyzed 3,356,805 lower extremity total joint arthroplasty patients from the Premier Healthcare database (Premier Healthcare Solutions, Inc., USA). The exposure of interest was race (White, Black, Asian, other). Outcomes were evidence-based perioperative practice adherence (eight individual care components; more than 80% of these implemented was defined as "high evidence-based perioperative practice"), any major complication (including acute renal failure, delirium, myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, respiratory failure, stroke, or in-hospital mortality), in-hospital mortality, and prolonged length of stay. RESULTS: Evidence-based perioperative practice adherence rate has increased over time and was associated with reduced complications across all racial groups. However, utilization among Black patients was below that for White patients between 2006 and 2021 (odds ratio, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.93 to 0.95]; 45.50% vs. 47.90% on average). Independent of whether evidence-based perioperative practice components were applied, Black patients exhibited higher odds of major complications (1.61 [95% CI, 1.55 to 1.67] with high evidence-based perioperative practice; 1.43 [95% CI, 1.39 to 1.48] without high evidence-based perioperative practice), mortality (1.70 [95% CI, 1.29 to 2.25] with high evidence-based perioperative practice; 1.29 [95% CI, 1.10 to 1.51] without high evidence-based perioperative practice), and prolonged length of stay (1.45 [95% CI, 1.42 to 1.48] with high evidence-based perioperative practice; 1.38 [95% CI, 1.37 to 1.40] without high evidence-based perioperative practice) compared to White patients. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence-based perioperative practice utilization in lower extremity joint arthroplasty has been increasing during the last decade. However, racial disparities still exist with Black patients consistently having lower odds of evidence-based perioperative practice adherence. Black patients (compared to the White patients) exhibited higher odds of composite major complications, mortality, and prolonged length of stay, independent of evidence-based perioperative practice use, suggesting that evidence-based perioperative practice did not impact racial disparities regarding particularly the Black patients in this surgical cohort.

Evidence-based guideline for the prevention and management of perioperative infection

We have updated the guideline for preventing and managing perioperative infection in China, given the global issues with antimicrobial resistance and the need to optimize antimicrobial usage and improve hospital infection control levels. We conducted a comprehensive evaluation of the evidence for prevention and management of perioperative infection, based on the concepts of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. The strength of recommendations was graded and voted using the Delphi method and the nominal group technique. Revisions were made to the guidelines in response to feedback from the experts. There were 17 questions prepared, for which 37 recommendations were made. According to the GRADE system, we evaluated the body of evidence for each clinical question. Based on the meta-analysis results, recommendations were graded using the Delphi method to generate useful information. This guideline provides evidence to perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis that increased the rational use of prophylactic antimicrobial use, with substantial improvement in the risk-benefit trade-off.

Percepção de enfermeiros acerca dos desafios à gestão do cuidado perioperatório: um estudo qualitativo / Nurses' perceived challenges in managing perioperative care: a qualitative study / Percepción de los enfermeros sobre los desafíos en la gestión del cuidado perioperatorio: un estudio cualitativo

Objetivo: Conhecer a percepção de enfermeiros sobre os desafios à gestão do cuidado perioperatório. Método: Estudo exploratório com abor-dagem qualitativa, a partir do referencial metodológico da Pesquisa Convergente-Assistencial. Amostra não probabilística, constituída de oito enfermei-ros responsáveis pela gestão do cuidado perioperatório. Resultados: Identificaram-se as palavras de maior frequência no corpus das entrevistas, elencadas três categorias temáticas a serem discutidas, a saber: insuficiência de recursos materiais; insuficiência de recursos humanos; e assistência de Enfermagem. Conclusão: A carência de recursos humanos e materiais foi considerada o principal obstáculo à gestão do cuidado perioperatório. A educação continuada se mostrou como forte aliada para otimização do cuidado de Enfermagem prestado

Objetivo: Conhecer a percepção de enfermeiros sobre os desafios à gestão do cuidado perioperatório. Método: Estudo exploratório com abor-dagem qualitativa, a partir do referencial metodológico da Pesquisa Convergente-Assistencial. Amostra não probabilística, constituída de oito enfermei-ros responsáveis pela gestão do cuidado perioperatório. Resultados: Identificaram-se as palavras de maior frequência no corpus das entrevistas, elencadas três categorias temáticas a serem discutidas, a saber: insuficiência de recursos materiais; insuficiência de recursos humanos; e assistência de Enfermagem. Conclusão: A carência de recursos humanos e materiais foi considerada o principal obstáculo à gestão do cuidado perioperatório. A educação continuada se mostrou como forte aliada para otimização do cuidado de Enfermagem prestad

Objetivo: Conocer la percepción de los enfermeros sobre los desafíos en la gestión del cuidado perioperatorio. Método: Estudio exploratorio con abordaje cualitativo, basado en el marco metodológico de la Investigación Convergente en Atención. Muestra no probabilística, constituida por ocho enfermeros responsables de la gestión del cuidado perioperatorio. Resultados: Se identificaron las palabras más frecuentes en el corpus de las entrevistas, enumerando tres categorías temáticas a ser discutidas, a saber: recursos materiales insuficientes; recursos humanos insuficientes; y cuidados de enferme-ría. Conclusión: La falta de recursos humanos y materiales fue considerada el principal obstáculo para la gestión del cuidado perioperatorio. La educa-ción continua demostró ser un fuerte aliado para optimizar los cuidados de enfermería prestados

Perioperativní péce / Perioperative care

Perioperacní péce zahrnuje velmi sirokou oblast elektivních a akutních výkonu napríc vekovým spektrem pacientu. Tato doporucení jsou zamerena na perioepracní péci v celé její síri. Cílem je optimalizovat a standardizovat tuto péci a zlepsit tak lécebné výsledky. Predkládaný KDP se venuje následujícím klinickým oblastem, které jsou zamereny na dospelé pacienty, kterí podstupují plánovaný nekardiochirurgický výkon: Poskytování informací a podpory pacientum; Vyuzívání postupu pro casné zotavení; Zhodnocení rizik operace; Intraoperacní péce (rízení tekutin, glukózy); Postoperacní péce; Rízení bolesti.

Perioperative care includes a very wide range of elective and acute procedures across the age spectrum of patients. These recommendations are focused on perioperative care in its entirety. The goal is to optimize and standardize this care and thus improve treatment results. The presented KDP deals with the following clinical areas, which are aimed at adult patients who undergo planned non-cardiac surgery: Providing information and support to patients; Use of procedures for early recovery; Risk assessment of the operation; Intraoperative care (fluid, glucose management); Postoperative care; Pain management.

Perioperative management of antithrombotic therapy: an American college of chest physicians clinical practice guideline

The American College of Chest Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline on the Perioperative Management of Antithrombotic Therapy addresses 43 Patients-Interventions-Comparators-Outcomes (PICO) questions related to the perioperative management of patients who are receiving long-term oral anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy and require an elective surgery/procedure. This guideline is separated into four broad categories, encompassing the management of patients who are receiving: (1) a vitamin K antagonist (VKA), mainly warfarin; (2) if receiving a VKA, the use of perioperative heparin bridging, typically with a low-molecular-weight heparin; (3) a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC); and (4) an antiplatelet drug. Strong or conditional practice recommendations are generated based on high, moderate, low, and very low certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology for clinical practice guidelines. A multidisciplinary panel generated 44 guideline recommendations for the perioperative management of VKAs, heparin bridging, DOACs, and antiplatelet drugs, of which two are strong recommendations: (1) against the use of heparin bridging in patients with atrial fibrillation; and (2) continuation of VKA therapy in patients having a pacemaker or internal cardiac defibrillator implantation. There are separate recommendations on the perioperative management of patients who are undergoing minor procedures, comprising dental, dermatologic, ophthalmologic, pacemaker/internal cardiac defibrillator implantation, and GI (endoscopic) procedures. Substantial new evidence has emerged since the 2012 iteration of these guidelines, especially to inform best practices for the perioperative management of patients who are receiving a VKA and may require heparin bridging, for the perioperative management of patients who are receiving a DOAC, and for patients who are receiving one or more antiplatelet drugs. Despite this new knowledge, uncertainty remains as to best practices for the majority of perioperative management

Executive Summary Perioperative Management of Antithrombotic Therapy: An American College of Chest Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline

Background The American College of Chest Physicians Clinical Practice Guideline on the Perioperative Management of Antithrombotic Therapy addresses 43 Patients-Interventions-Comparators-Outcomes (PICO) questions related to the perioperative management of patients who are receiving long-term oral anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy and require an elective surgery/procedure. This guideline is separated into four broad categories, encompassing the management of patients who are receiving: (1) a vitamin K antagonist (VKA), mainly warfarin; (2) if receiving a VKA, the use of perioperative heparin bridging, typically with a low-molecular-weight heparin; (3) a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC); and (4) an antiplatelet drug.

Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Elective Abdominal and Pelvic Surgery at Primary and Secondary Hospitals in Low­Middle-Income Countries (LMIC's): Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society Recommendation

This is the first Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society guideline for primary and secondary hospitals in low­middle-income countries (LMIC's) for elective abdominal and gynecologic care. The ERAS LMIC Guidelines group was established by the ERAS® Society in collaboration with different representatives of perioperative care from LMIC's. The group consisted of seven members from the ERAS® Society and eight members from LMIC's. An updated systematic literature search and evaluation of evidence from previous ERAS® guidelines was performed by the leading authors of the Colorectal (2018) and Gynecologic (2019) surgery guidelines (Gustafsson et al in World J Surg 43:6592­695, Nelson et al in Int J Gynecol Cancer 29(4):651­668). Meta-analyses randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective and retrospective cohort studies from both HIC's and LMIC's were considered for each perioperative item. The members in the LMIC group then applied the current evidence and adapted the recommendations for each intervention as well as identifying possible new items relevant to LMIC's. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system (GRADE) methodology was used to determine the quality of the published evidence. The strength of the recommendations was based on importance of the problem, quality of evidence, balance between desirable and undesirable effects, acceptability to key stakeholders, cost of implementation and specifically the feasibility of implementing in LMIC's and determined through discussions and consensus. In addition to previously described ERAS® Society interventions, the following items were included, revised or discussed: the Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC), preoperative routine human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing in countries with a high prevalence of HIV/AIDS (CD4 and viral load for those patients that are HIV positive), delirium screening and prevention, COVID 19 screening, VTE prophylaxis, immuno-nutrition, prehabilitation, minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and a standardized postoperative monitoring guideline. These guidelines are seen as a starting point to address the urgent need to improve perioperative care and to effect data-driven, evidence-based care in LMIC's.

Improving safety and outcomes in perioperative care: does implementation matter?

The IMPROVE study describes a large perioperative quality improvement project with reporting of both compliance with improvement activities and patient outcomes. It highlights the importance of such projects, as well as the challenges in implementing change and proving benefit. Challenges identified include the importance of effective training in practice change, selection of trial design and relevant quality measures, and how the context of quality improvement initiatives may influence outcomes. Quality improvement programmes of this nature, despite the difficulties with implementation and trial design, remain a high priority because of their positive influence on improving clinical practice.

Preoperative Management of Medications for Neurologic Diseases: Society for Perioperative Assessment and Quality Improvement Consensus Statement.

Neurologic diseases are prevalent in patients undergoing invasive procedures; yet, no societal guidelines exist as to best practice in management of perioperative medications prescribed to treat these disorders. The Society for Perioperative Assessment and Quality Improvement tasked experts in internal medicine, anesthesiology, perioperative medicine, and neurology to provide evidence-based recommendations for preoperative management of these medications. The aim of this review is not only to provide consensus recommendations for preoperative management of patients on medications for neurologic disorders, but also to serve as an educational guide to perioperative clinicians. While, in general, medications for neurologic disorders should be continued preoperatively, an individualized approach may be needed in certain situations (eg, holding anticonvulsants on day of surgery if electroencephalographic mapping is planned during epilepsy surgery). Pertinent interactions with commonly used drugs in anesthesia practice, as well as considerations for targeted laboratory testing or perioperative drug substitutions, are addressed as well.

Preoperative Management of Medications for Psychiatric Diseases: Society for Perioperative Assessment and Quality Improvement Consensus Statement.

There is a lack of guidelines for preoperative management of psychiatric medications leading to variation in care and the potential for perioperative complications and surgical procedure cancellations on the day of surgery. The Society for Perioperative Assessment and Quality Improvement identified preoperative psychiatric medication management as an area in which consensus could improve patient care. The aim of this consensus statement is to provide recommendations to clinicians regarding preoperative psychiatric medication management. Several categories of drugs were identified including antidepressants, mood stabilizers, anxiolytics, antipsychotics, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder medications. Literature searches and review of primary and secondary data sources were performed for each medication/medication class. We used a modified Delphi process to develop consensus recommendations for preoperative management of individual medications in each of these drug categories. While most medications should be continued perioperatively to avoid risk of relapse of the psychiatric condition, adjustments may need to be made on a case-by-case basis for certain drugs.

Peri-operative neurological monitoring with electroencephalography and cerebral oximetry: a narrative review.

Surgery and anaesthesia subject the brain to considerable stress in the peri-operative period. This may be caused by potentially neurotoxic anaesthetic drugs, impaired cerebral perfusion and reperfusion injury related to surgery or thromboembolic events. Patient monitoring using electroencephalogram and cerebral oximetry can assist in optimising depth of anaesthesia and assessment of cerebral metabolic activity. However, research findings have been contradictory as to whether these monitors can help ameliorate peri-operative neurocognitive complications. In this narrative review, we will discuss recent evidence in the use of electroencephalography and cerebral oximetry and the underlying scientific principles. It is important to appreciate the raw electroencephalographic changes under anaesthesia and those associated with ageing, in order to interpret depth of anaesthesia indices correctly. Cerebral oximetry is useful not only for the detection of cerebral desaturation but also to identify those patients who are particularly vulnerable to injury, for better risk stratification. An algorithm-based approach may be most effective in managing the episodes of cerebral desaturation.

Management of DOAC in Patients Undergoing Planned Surgery or Invasive Procedure: Italian Federation of Centers for the Diagnosis of Thrombotic Disorders and the Surveillance of the Antithrombotic Therapies (FCSA) Position Paper.

Patients on anticoagulant treatment are constantly increasing, with an estimated prevalence in Italy of 2% of the total population. About a quarter of the anticoagulated patients require temporary cessation of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) or vitamin K antagonists for a planned intervention within 2 years from anticoagulation inception. Several clinical issues about DOAC interruption remain unanswered: many questions are tentatively addressed daily by thousands of physicians worldwide through an experience-based balancing of thrombotic and bleeding risks. Among possible valuable answers, the Italian Federation of Centers for the diagnosis of thrombotic disorders and the Surveillance of the Antithrombotic therapies (FCSA) proposes some experience-based suggestions and expert opinions. In particular, FCSA provides practical guidance on the following issues: (1) multiparametric assessment of thrombotic and bleeding risks based on patients' individual and surgical risk factor, (2) testing of prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, and DOAC plasma levels before surgery or invasive procedure, (3) use of heparin, (4) restarting of full-dose DOAC after high risk bleeding surgery, (5) practical nonpharmacological suggestions to manage patients perioperatively. Finally, FCSA suggests creating a multidisciplinary "anticoagulation team" with the aim to define the optimal perioperative management of anticoagulation.

Should Antiplatelet Therapy Be Withheld Perioperatively? The First Study Examining Outcomes in Patients Receiving Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in the Lower Extremity Free Flap Population.

BACKGROUND: Antiplatelet agents are typically withheld perioperatively because of bleeding concerns. Dual antiplatelet therapy, such as aspirin and clopidogrel, has significant morbidity and mortality benefits in patients with ischemic heart disease or peripheral vascular disease. This study aims to evaluate the impact of perioperative dual antiplatelet therapy in the lower extremity free tissue transfer population. METHODS: Lower extremity free tissue transfers performed by the senior author (K.K.E.) from 2011 to 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics, comorbidities, perioperative dual antiplatelet therapy, and free tissue transfer characteristics were recorded. Outcomes of interest included flap success, hematoma formation, blood transfusion requirements, and cardiac event occurrence. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-five free tissue transfers were included. Median age at the time of free tissue transfer was 56.5 years. Median Charlson Comorbidity Index was 3. Thirty-four patients were on clopidogrel, which was either withheld (n = 20) or continued (n = 14) on the day of free tissue transfer. Incidence of blood transfusion was significantly higher in both the withheld and continued versus nonclopidogrel groups. Flap success was statistically equivalent between groups (withheld, 90.0 percent; continued, 92.9 percent; nonclopidogrel, 95.0 percent; p = 0.346). Cardiac events occurred most often in the continued group (21.4 percent) compared to the withheld (5.0 percent) and nonclopidogrel (0.6 percent) groups. On multivariate analysis, holding clopidogrel remained significant for increased odds of postoperative transfusion. The clopidogrel group was no longer significant for intraoperative transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: Despite increases in volume of blood products transfused, free tissue transfer can be performed safely with perioperative dual antiplatelet therapy. Withholding dual antiplatelet therapy on the day of free tissue transfer was not associated with decreased intraoperative transfusion; thus, dual antiplatelet therapy can safely be continued throughout the operative course to minimize cardiovascular risk. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.